Material Comparison Table_Plate Mounting sleeve_sleeveX™

CN
EN
sleeveX™ Plate Mounting sleeve Material Comparison Table
Comparison Table of Physical and Chemical Properties of Filling Support Layer Materials
This table is compiled based on publicly available technical data sheets (TDS) and standard testing methods
Chemical Properties Comparison
Technical Specif ications Aramid HoneycombPU FoamCoremat(Lantor soric xf)
Material TypeAramid Paper (e.g., Nomex )Polyether or Polyester-based PolyurethaneThermoplastic Foam Honeycomb Core
Chemical ResistanceExcellent (Resistant to a wide range of chemicals)Fair / Moderate (Susceptible to solvents/acids/bases)Good (Stable with many resins/chemicals)
Hydrolysis ResistanceOutstandingPoor (Susceptible to Hydrolysis)Good (Polyester exhibits moderate stability to moisture)
Thermal StabilityMaximum Continuous Service Temperature: 200-220°C

Operating Temperature Range: 80-100°C (High-performance grades up to 150°C

Maximum Process Temperature (postimpregnation):170°C
Flame RetardancySelf-extinguishing, compliant with multiple flame retardant standardsModerate (Can be flame-retarded with additives)Moderate (Can be enhanced with flame-retardant resins)
UV StabilityGood (Requires a protective facing/laminate)Poor (Prone to degradation/aging)Fair / Moderate (Requires surface protection)

Swelling Resistance in 

Organic Medi

Low. Aramid fibers remain stable in alcohol and ketone solvents

Prone to swelling or degradation, particularly by ketones and esters.Polyester substrates are stable towards most solvents with minimal swelling.
Water SwellingVery low (<1%). Although the fibers themselves are hydrophilic, they become stable after treatment.High (Open-cell type absorbs water and can expand 10-20% by volume).

Low (Polyester fibers absorb moisture slightly but become stable after being fully encapsulated by resin).

Dimensional StabilityOutstanding

Fair / Moderate (significantly affected by humidity and temperature changes)

Good (especially after being fully encapsulated in resin)


Physical Properties Comparison
Technical Specifications Aramid HoneycombP U  FoamCoremat(Lantor soric xf)
Thickness Range (mm)3–30(Typically 3-12)5-50+1.5–10(XF‑3 is 3 mm)
Density (kg/m³)29–144(Typically 48-72)30-100About 600(XF-3 resin cured)
Compressive Strength (MPa)1–10(Varies with density)0.02-0.38 (@10% strain)
Flexural Strength (MPa)6–20(Face sheet bending strength)<1(not measured)8
Structural StrengthHigh (Superior to most core materials)Low (For filling/insulation purposes)Medium (Suitable as a lightweight core)
Flexural Modulus (GPa)0.3-2.5<0.050.8 GPa(=800 MPa)

Shear Strength (MPa)

0.5-3.50.05-0.23.5 MPa
Shear Modulus (MPa)20-1001-1035 MPa

Water Absorption (%)

<13-10(Low in closed-cell form, but high in open-cell form)low (No data, estimated<2%)
Thermal Conductivity (W/m·K)0.03-0.060.02-0.04 0.05–0.07(estimated)

Coefficient of Thermal Expansion(µm/m·K)

2-5(Very low, comparable to aluminum,resulting in exceptionally high dimensional stability.)50-150(Depends on density and open/close cell type)

20–40(Polyester non-woven fabrics is 60-80,after resin cured is 20-50 ,depends on specific resin system employed)

Compression Set 0.8 bar Vacuum (%)<5%>15%(soft)<10%(Soric XF-3)
Processing Temperature Range (°C)≤200–220≤100–120≤170(Lantor recommended)